Modelos e estilos de liderança na administração pública em contexto de teletrabalho

Adalberto Barreto; Maria José Sousa

doi:10.37467/gka-revsocial.v10.2636

Autores/as

Adalberto Barreto ISCTE-IUL
Maria José Sousa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/gka-revsocial.v10.2636

Palabras clave:

Liderança, Teletrabalho, Administração Pública, Portugal

Resumen

O principal objetivo da presente pesquisa é analisar o modelo ou estilo de liderança que pode ser mais eficaz em contexto de teletrabalho na administração pública. Neste enquadramento a pergunta de partida ou questão de pesquisa é: qual o modelo (ou modelos) e estilo de liderança mais adequado, para a administração pública, em regime de teletrabalho. A metodologia utilizada foi a qualitativa com base numa revisão da literatura e os resultados evidenciam que uma liderança transformacional, servidora, situacional, democrática e com representatividade ativa de género, constitui a forma mais eficaz na implementação de programas de teletrabalho na Administração Pública.

Citas

Bae, K., Lee, D. y Sohn, H. (2019). How to increase participation in telework programs in U.S. Federal Agencies: examining the effects of being a female supervisor, supportive leadership, and diversity management. Public personnel management, 48(4), 565-583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026019832920

Dahlstrom, T. (2013). Telecommuting and leadership style. Public Personnel Management, 42(3), 438-451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026013495731

Eikenberry, K. y Turmel, W. (2018). The long-distance leader: rules for remarkable remote leadership. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Gibson, J. et al. (2002). Telecommuting in the 21th century: benefits, issues, and a leadership model which will work. The journal of leadership studies, 8(4), 75-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190200800407

Glyn M. y Dejordy, R. (2010). Leadership through an organization behavior lens. Handbook of leadership: theory and practice. Harvard Business Press.

Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard business review, 78(2), 4-17.

Goleman, D. (2005). Emotional intelligence. Bantam Dell.

Kelley, E. y Kelloway, K. (2012). Context matters: testing a model of remote leadership. Journal of leadership & organizational studies, 19(4), 437–449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051812454173

Kwon, M. y Jeon S. (2018). Do leadership commitment and performance-oriented culture matter for federal teleworker satisfaction with telework programs? Review of public personnel administration, 40(1), 36–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X18776049

Mahler, J. (2012). The telework divide: managerial and personnel challenges of telework. Review of public personnel administration, 32(4). 407-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X12458127

McPheat, S. (2010). Leadership skills. MDT Training & Ventus Publishing.

Moussa, M., McMurray, A. y Muenjohn, N. (2018). Innovation and leadership in public sector organizations. Journal of management research, 10(3), 14-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v10i3.13101

Neufeld, D., Wan, Z. y Fang, Y. (2010). Remote Leadership, Communication Effectiveness and Leader Performance. Group decision & negotiation, 19(3), 227.246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-008-9142-x

Sacavém, A. et al. (2019). An integrative literature review on leadership models for innovative organizations. Journal of reviews on global economics, 8, 1741-1751.

Saleem, H. (2015). The impact of leadership styles on job satisfaction and mediating role of perceived organizational politics. Procedia: Social and behavioral sciences, 172, 563-569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.403

Van Wart, M. (2003). Public-Sector Leadership Theory: An Assessment. Public administration review, 63(2), 214-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00281

Virtanen, P. y Tammeaid, M. (2020). Developing public sector leadership: new rationale, best practices and tools. Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42311-7