Rural Gentrification as a Factor of Persistence of both the original population and agricultural activities: Evidence from Morelos, Mexico

Authors

  • Matthew James Lorenzen Martiny Universidad de Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/gka-revsocial.v3.1132

Keywords:

Rural Gentrification, New Rurality, Rurbanisation

Abstract

This paper is based on research carried out in three municipalities of the state of Morelos, Mexico, where we conducted semi-structured interviews with farmers and rural inhabitants. We address the hypothesis that processes of rural gentrification can incite the persistence of the native population and of agricultural activities through the creation of supplementary sources of work. This hypothesis challenges a part of the literature on gentrification that maintains a rigid notion of gentrification, essentially applicable to situations of urban renovation, and that involves the displacement of the native population with a newly arrived high-income population. In contrast, this paper joins the arguments of another group of researchers that defend a more flexible notion of gentrification, applicable to other geographical areas (peri-urban and rural spaces) and to contexts involving new real-estate developments, where the displacement phenomenon is far from being widespread. Our fieldwork made clear that far from contributing to the displacement of the native population, the influx of high-income groups, be they tourists, temporal or permanent residents, has promoted the creation of local employment opportunities that benefit the local population.

Author Biography

Matthew James Lorenzen Martiny, Universidad de Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne

Doctorando en sociología en la Universidad de Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Francia, y maestro en estudios regionales en el Instituto de Investigaciones Dr. José María Luis Mora, México. Se ha especializado en temas de sociología y geografía rural, particularmente en los efectos de la urbanización en la agricultura y en las comunidades rurales y rurbanas de la región centro de México.

References

Byrne, P.J. (2003). “Two Cheers for Gentrification”. Howard Law Journal 46(3), 405-432.

Davidson, M. y Lees, L. (2010). “New-Build Gentrification: its Histories, Trajectories, and Critical Geographies”. Population, Space and Place 16, 395-411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.584

Freeman, L. (2005). “Displacement or Succession? Residential Mobility in Gentrifying Neighborhoods”. Urban Affairs Review 40(4), 463-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087404273341

Freeman, L. (2008). “Testimony of Lance Freeman to The National Commission on Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity”, http://www.prrac.org/projects/fair_housing_commission/atlanta/freeman.pdf (consultado el 24 de marzo de 2014).

Glass, R. (1964). “Introduction: aspects of change”. En: Centre for Urban Studies, London: Aspects of Change (pp. xiii-xlii), Londres: MacKibbon and Kee.

Guimond, L. y Simard, M. (2008). “Néo-ruralité et embourgeoisement des campagnes québécoises: un regard nuancé”. Trabajo presentado en el XLVe Colloque de l’Association de Science Régionale de Langue Française (ASRDLF) , Rimouski, Canadá, agosto de 2008.

Guimond, L. y Simard, M. (2010). “Gentrification and Neo-Rural Populations in the Québec Countryside: Representations of Various Actors”. Journal of Rural Studies 26, 449-464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.06.002

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2010a). Marco Geoestadístico 2010 [Archivo de datos], http://www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/geoestadistica/m_geoestadistico.aspx (consultado el 24 de marzo de 2014).

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2010b). Censo de Población y Vivienda 2010 [Archivo de datos]. http://www.inegi.org.mx/est/contenidos/proyectos/ccpv/cpv2010/Default.aspx (consultado el 24 de marzo de 2014).

Lees, L., Slater T. y Wyly, E. (2010). “Introduction”. En: Lees, L., Slater, T. y Wyly, E. (Eds.). The Gentrification Reader (pp. xi-xxiii), Londres y Nueva York: Routledge.

Simard, M. (2007). “Nouvelles populations rurales et conflits au Québec: regards croisés avec la France et le Royaume-Uni”. Géographie, Économie, Société 9(2), 187-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3166/ges.9.187-213

Simard, M. (2011). “Transformation des campagnes et nouvelles populations rurales au Québec et en France: une introduction”. Canadian Journal of Regional Science / Revue canadienne des sciences régionales 34(4), 105-114.

Slater, T. (2009). “Missing Marcuse. On gentrification and displacement”. City 13(2), 292-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982250

Vigdor, J. (2001). “Does Gentrification Harm the Poor?” Trabajo presentado en el Brookings-Wharton Conference on Urban Affairs , Washington D.C., octubre de 2001.

Vigdor, J. (2002). “Does Gentrification Harm the Poor? Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 133-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/urb.2002.0012

Published

06-03-2014

How to Cite

Lorenzen Martiny, M. J. (2014). Rural Gentrification as a Factor of Persistence of both the original population and agricultural activities: Evidence from Morelos, Mexico. SOCIAL REVIEW. International Social Sciences Review Revista Internacional De Ciencias Sociales, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.37467/gka-revsocial.v3.1132

Issue

Section

Research articles