Cybersecurity in the Face of Hybrid Threats

Challenges and solutions from the University

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62701/revsocial.v14.5565

Keywords:

Cybersecurity, Disinformation, University education, Hybrid threats, Interdisciplinary training, Psychological manipulation, Cognitive warfare

Abstract

This paper analyzes the growing gap between university cybersecurity education and the demands of hybrid threats, which combine technical attacks with psychological manipulation and disinformation. Through a qualitative-documentary review of academic programs and case studies (Ukraine, Taiwan, Israel), it identifies critical training gaps in social sciences, media literacy, and cognitive defense. The study proposes an integrated educational model that merges technical skills with narrative analysis, political communication, and mass psychology. One effective cybersecurity requires interdisciplinary, hybrid professionals capable of protecting not only systems but also democratic resilience and epistemic trust.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Global Statistics ℹ️

Cumulative totals since publication
14
Views
3
Downloads
17
Total

References

Bellingcat. (2024). Digital disinformation in modern conflicts. https://www.bellingcat.com

Castells, M. (2021). La sociedad red: Una visión global. Alianza Editorial.

Departamento de Seguridad Nacional de EE.UU. (2023). Estrategia nacional contra amenazas híbridas. https://www.dhs.gov

European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA). (2023). Hybrid threats and cybersecurity education: Trends and gaps. https://www.enisa.europa.eu

Foro Económico Mundial. (2023). Informe global de riesgos 2023. https://www.weforum.org

Global Cybersecurity Index. (2023). Medición de capacidades nacionales en ciberseguridad. Unión Internacional de Telecomunicaciones.

Goldstein, J. A., DiResta, R., Sastry, G., Musser, M., Gentzel, M., & Sedova, K. (2023). Generative language models and automated influence operations: Emerging threats and potential mitigations. Stanford Internet Observatory, OpenAI, & Georgetown University Center for Security and Emerging Technology. https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/io/publication/generative-language-models-and-automated-influence-operations-emerging-threats-and

IBM Security. (2023). Cost of a data breach report 2023. https://www.ibm.com/security

Instituto de Ciberseguridad de España. (2023). Estándares para certificaciones profesionales. https://www.incibe.es

MIT Technology Review. (2023). Generative AI as a tool for disinformation. https://www.technologyreview.com

NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. (2022). Cognitive security framework. https://www.stratcomcoe.org

OECD. (2023). Digital education outlook 2023. OECD Publishing.

Pacheco, F. (2024). Hacia una ciberseguridad integral: divergencias y puentes entre los enfoques de la academia, la industria y la comunidad hacker. Revista Latinoamericana de Economía y Sociedad Digital, Issue Especial 2. https://doi.org/10.53857/RLESD.04.2023.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53857/RLESD.04.2023.03

Vargas, E. S. (2023). El impacto de las Tecnologías de la Información en el reciente auge de las extremas derechas. En M. J. Vicente Vicente (Ed.), Las nuevas extremas derechas en el mundo (pp. 129-150). Editorial Tirant Lo Blanch.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

Published

01-07-2026

How to Cite

Vicente Vicente, M. J. (2026). Cybersecurity in the Face of Hybrid Threats: Challenges and solutions from the University. SOCIAL REVIEW. International Social Sciences Review Revista Internacional De Ciencias Sociales, 14(1), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.62701/revsocial.v14.5565

Issue

Section

Research articles