Clinical simulation with generative AI

Pre-post validation of competencies and international evidence on the acceptability and contextual relevance of GlorIA

Authors

  • Fernanda Orrego Müller Gabriela Mistral University
  • Marcelo Acuña Faúndez Universidad Gabriela Mistral
  • Mariela Jana Aguilera Universidad Gabriela Mistral

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62701/revsocial.v14.5598

Keywords:

Clinical simulation, Generative artificial intelligence, Clinical competencies, Psychology training, Virtual patients, Acceptability, Online higher education

Abstract

This article analyses the training contribution of GlorIA, a clinical simulator based on generative artificial intelligence, in psychology education. It integrates two experiences: a pilot study in Chile (N = 48) with a mixed design and pre-post measurement of basic clinical competencies, and an international pilot in 2025 (N = 119) focused on usability, satisfaction, acceptability and contextual relevance. In Chile, significant improvements were observed in all dimensions assessed. In the international pilot, high ratings predominated, with no significant differences by country, although clinical realism showed greater dispersion. GlorIA provides initial evidence of training effectiveness and potential for regional transfer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Global Statistics ℹ️

Cumulative totals since publication
2
Views
0
Downloads
2
Total

References

Castellón Mendoza, W. R. (2017). Habilidades terapéuticas y limitaciones en la aplicación de terapias de tercera generación en América Latina. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva, 19(3), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.31505/rbtcc.v19i3.1067

Crocamo, L. N. y Benatuil, D. (2022). Escala de competencias clínicas básicas para psicoterapeutas (ECCBP): Construcción y fiabilidad para Argentina. Interdisciplinaria, 39(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.16888/interd.2022.39.1.4

De la Rosa-Gómez, A., Flores-Elvira, A. I. y Miranda-Díaz, G. A. (2022). Actitudes de estudiantes y docentes de psicología ante el uso de tecnologías en las intervenciones clínicas. Tesis Psicológica, 17(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.37511/tesis.v17n2a8

De la Rosa-Gómez, A., González-Pérez, M. A., Rueda-Trejo, J. A. y Rivera-Baños, J. (2017). La práctica supervisada mediada por tecnología como escenario para la enseñanza de competencias clínicas. Hamut’ay, 4(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.21503/hamu.v4i1.1396

Escudero, E., Silva, M. y Corvetto, M. (2019). Simulation: A training resource for quality care and improving patient safety. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88918

Guerra, C., Venegas, C., Ulloa, L., Plaza, H. y Moltedo-Perfetti, A. (2015). Validación preliminar del instrumento de medición de actitudes en psicólogos y estudiantes de psicología (IAPE). Summa Psicológica, 12(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.18774/448x.2015.12.252

Hossain, S. I., Kelson, J. y Morrison, B. (2024). The use of virtual patient simulations in psychology: A scoping review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9559

Kononowicz, A. A., Woodham, L. A., Edelbring, S., Stathakarou, N., Davies, D., Saxena, N., Tudor Car, L., Carlstedt-Duke, J., Car, J. y Zary, N. (2019). Virtual patient simulations in health professions education: Systematic review and meta-analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(7), Artículo e14676. https://doi.org/10.2196/14676

Matsumoto-Royo, K. y Conget, P. (2024). Oportunidades de aprendizaje de la práctica pedagógica en el campus universitario: planificación, ejecución y contribución en la formación profesional de futuros docentes. Pensamiento Educativo, 61(2), Artículo 00105. https://doi.org/10.7764/pel.61.2.2024.5

Morrison, B. W., Kelson, J., Morrison, N. M. V. y Bennett, G. (2026). You’re virtually a psychologist: Enhancing professional psychology education through virtual client simulations. Australian Psychologist, 61(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2025.2547800

Nurse, K., O’Shea, M., Ling, M., Castle, N. y Sheen, J. (2025). The influence of deliberate practice on skill performance in therapeutic practice: A systematic review of early studies. Psychotherapy Research, 35(3), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2308159

Paparo, J., Beccaria, G., Canoy, D., Chur-Hansen, A., Conti, J. E., Correia, H., Dudley, A., Gooi, C., Hammond, S., Kavanagh, P. S., Monfries, M., Norris, K., Oxlad, M., Rooney, R. M., Sawyer, A., Sheen, J., Xenos, S., Yap, K. y Thielking, M. (2021). A new reality: The role of simulated learning activities in postgraduate psychology training programs. Frontiers in Education, 6, Artículo 653269. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.653269

Prado-Abril, J., Fernández-Álvarez, J., Sánchez-Reales, S., Youn, S. J., Inchausti, F. y Molinari, G. (2019). La persona del terapeuta: Validación española del Cuestionario de Evaluación del Estilo Personal del Terapeuta (EPT-C). Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 24(3), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.24367

Rice, K., Murray, C. V., Tully, P. J., Hone, A., Bartik, W. J., Newby, D. y Cosh, S. M. (2022). Commentary: An extension of the Australian Postgraduate Psychology Education Simulation Working Group guidelines: Simulated learning activities within professional psychology placements. Frontiers in Education, 7, Artículo 840258. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.840258

Sanz, A., Tapia, J. L., García-Carpintero, E., Rocabado, J. F. y Pedrajas, L. M. (2025). ChatGPT simulated patient: Use in clinical training in psychology. Psicothema, 37(3), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.70478/psicothema.2025.37.21

Smith, M. J., Bornheimer, L. A., Li, J., Blajeski, S., Hiltz, B., Fischer, D. J., Check, K. y Ruffolo, M. (2021). Computerized clinical training simulations with virtual clients abusing alcohol: Initial feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness. Clinical Social Work Journal, 49(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-020-00779-4

Downloads

Published

12-11-2026

How to Cite

Orrego Müller, F., Acuña Faúndez, M., & Jana Aguilera, M. (2026). Clinical simulation with generative AI: Pre-post validation of competencies and international evidence on the acceptability and contextual relevance of GlorIA. SOCIAL REVIEW. International Social Sciences Review Revista Internacional De Ciencias Sociales, 14(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.62701/revsocial.v14.5598

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026)

Section

Research articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Fernanda Orrego Müller, Marcelo Acuña Faúndez, Mariela Jana Aguilera

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright.

  2. Authors transfer to the journal the right of first publication. The journal also owns the publishing rights.

  3. All published contents are governed by an Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
    Access the informative version and legal text of the license. By virtue of this, third parties are allowed to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal. If you transform the material, you may not distribute the modified work.

  4. Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.

  5. Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional and personal websites), following the publication of, and referencing the journal, as this could lead to constructive exchanges and a more extensive and quick circulation of published works (see The Effect of Open Access).