A Logical Criterion for Assessing the Acceptability of Press Headlines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37467/gka-revsocial.v3.812Keywords:
Logical Criterion, Deduction, Formal Validity, Propositions, Semantic Strength of a Proposition, Fallacy, Analytic Entailment, Discourse Analysis, News Structure, Headline, ThemeAbstract
The aim of this paper is to propose tentatively a normative logical criterion for assessing the acceptability of headlines in the press defined in terms of the informativeness or semantic strength of propositions they express. Additionally, we show that proposed criterion fits well with van Dijk's application of Discourse Analysis Theory to the structures of news in the press. To conclude, we give some examples of application of this criterion to news published in national and regional digital newspapers.
References
Bentham, J. (1990). Falacias Políticas . Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
Hamblin, C. L. (1970). Fallacies . Newport News: Vale Press.
Migura, F. (2014). “Sesgos y falacias en la información periodística basada en encuestas y estadísticas”. En: Carrascal, B, (ed.) Argumentación y prensa . Bilbao: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco, pp. 77-112.
Van Dijk, T. (1977). Text and Context. Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London and New York: Longman.
Van Dijk, T. (1980a). Macrostructures in Discourse: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition . Hillsdale, N. J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Van Dijk, T. (1980b). "The semantics and pragmatics of functional coherence in discourse". In: A. Ferrara, (Ed.) Speech act theory: Ten years later . Milano: Special issue of Versus, 26/27.
Van Dijk, T. (1983). “Discourse analysis: Its development and application to the structures of news”. Journal of Communication 33/2, 20-43.
Van Dijk, T. (1985a). “Structures of news in the press”. In: van Dijk, (Ed.) (1985). Discourse and Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 69-93.
Van Dijk, T. (1985b). “Introduction: Discourse analysis in (mass) communication research.” In: van Dijk, (Ed.) Discourse and Communication , 69-93.
Van Dijk, T. (1985c). "Introduction: Discourse analysis as a new cross-discipline.” In: van Dijk, (Ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis (C3) Vol. 1: Disciplines of discourse . London: Academic Press, pp. 1-10.
Van Dijk, T. (1986). “News schemata.” In: S. Greenbaum & Cooper, (Eds.) Studying Writing. Linguistic approaches . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 155- 186.
Van Dijk, T. (1988a). News as Discourse . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (Hay traducción al castellano: La noticia como discurso . Paidós. Barcelona, 1990)
Van Dijk, T. (1988b). News Analysis . Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Van Dijk, T. (1991). “The interdisciplinary study of news as discourse.” In: K. Bruhn-Jensen & N. Jankowksi (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Mass Communication Research. London: Routledge, pp.108-120.
Walton, D. (1989). Informal Logic . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walton, D. (1999). “Rethinking the Fallacy of Hasty Generalization.” Argumentation 13: 161-182.
Walton, D. (2007). Media Argumentation: Dialectic, Persuasion and Rhetoric . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walton. D. & Gordon, F. (2009). “Jumping to a Conclusion: Fallacies and Standard of Proof.” Informal Logic 29: 215-243.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:
- Authors will keep the moral right of the work and they will transfer the commercial rights.
- After 1 year from publication, the work shall thereafter be open access online on our website, but will retain copyright.
- In the event that the authors wish to assign an Creative Commons (CC) license, they may request it by writing to publishing@eagora.org
