Education Professionals' Knowledge And Needs Regarding Bullying

Authors

  • Amaia Lojo Novo Boise State University
  • Brett Shelton
  • Katie Bubak Azevedo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/gka-revedu.v8.2665

Keywords:

Bullying, Self-efficacy, Bullying intervention, Teacher education

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze teachers' and other education professionals' needs and knowledge when dealing with bullying situations. Data collection was carried out in two different sessions of a bullying prevention one-day symposium at a four-year state university. The participants were 53 educational professionals from several elementary and middle schools. Qualitative analysis of session artifacts revealed that participants had a basic understanding of bullying; however, they doubt its definition and how to identify when it occurs. Participants in the case study were interested in being change agents when it comes to addressing bullying problems. However, they lacked self-confidence and access to appropriate resources to overcome their fears and diminished self- efficacy for proper intervention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Global Statistics ℹ️

Cumulative totals since publication
484
Views
205
Downloads
689
Total

References

Álvarez-García, D., Rodríguez, C., González-Castro, P., Núñez, J. C. & Álvarez, L. (2010). La formación de los futuros docentes frente a la violencia escolar. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 15(1), 35–56.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Byers, D.L., Caltabiano, N.J. & Caltabiano, M.L. (2011). Teachers’ attitudes towardsovert and covert bullying, and perceived efficacy to intervene. Australian Journal ofTeacher Education, 36(11), 105–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n11.1

Blaya, C., Derarbieux, E. & Lucas Molina, B. (2007). La violencia hacia las mujeres y hacia otras personas percibidas como distintas a la norma dominante: el caso de los centros educativos. Revista de Educación, (342), 61–83.

Bradshaw, C. P., Waasdorp, T. E., O' Brennan, L. M. & Gulemetova, M. (2013). Teachers' and Education Support Professionals' Perspectives on Bullying and Prevention: Findings from a National Education Association Study. School Psychology Review, 42(3), 280–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087474

Cajigas de Segredo, N., Khan, E., Luzardo, M., Najson, S. & Zamalvide, G. (2004) Escala de Agresión entre Pares para Adolescentes y Principales Resultados. Bullying Scale for Adolescents and Main Results. Acción Psicológica, 3 (3), 173-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.3.3.511

Díaz-Aguado, M. J. (2006). El acoso escolar y la prevención de la violencia en la familia. Madrid: Consejería de Familia y Asuntos Sociales.

Eden, S., Heiman, T. & Olenik-Shemesh, D. (2013). Teachers' perceptions, beliefs and concerns about cyberbullying. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 1036–1052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01363.x

Eslea, M. and Rees, J. (2001). At what age are children most likely to be bullied at school? Aggressive Behavior, 27: 419-429. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.1027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.1027

Gaines, J. (2016). Finland is really good at stopping bullying. Here's how they're doing it. Retrieved from http://www.upworthy.com/finland-is-really-good-at-stopping-bullying-heres-how-theyre-doing-it

Gelo, O., Braakmann, D. & Benetka, G. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research: Beyond the debate. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42(3), 266–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-008-9078-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-008-9078-3

Gladden, R. M., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Hamburger, M. E. & Lumpkin, C. D. (2014). Bullying surveillance among youths: Uniform definitions for public health and recommended data elements, Version 1.0. Atlanta, GA; National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and U. S. Department of Education.

Idaho Youth Risk Behavior Survey, 2017. Summary Report. (2017). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/62497910?accountid=14695

Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A. & Salmivalli, C. (2011). A Large-Scale Evaluation of the KiVa Antibullying Program: Grades 4-6. Child Development, 82(1), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.l467-8624.2010.01557.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x

KiVa Anti-Bullying Program. (2016). KiVa International. Retrieved January 9, 2018, from http://www.kivaprogram.net/

Lester, L., Waters, S., Pearce, N., Spears, B., & Falconer, S. (2018). Pre-service teachers: Knowledge, Attitudes, and their Perceived Skills in Addressing Student Bullying. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(8), 30-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n8.3

Nixon, C. L. (2014). Current perspectives: The impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 5, 143–158. doi:https://doi.org/10.2147/AHMT.S36456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/AHMT.S36456

Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school: Long-term outcomes for the victims and an effective school-based intervention program. In R. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive behavior: Current perspectives (pp. 97–130). NewYork: Plenum Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9116-7_5

Olweus, D. (2013). School Bullying: Development and Some Important Challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 751–780. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516

Rigby, K., & Bagshaw, D. (2003). Prospects of adolescent students collaborating with teachers in addressing issues of bullying and conflict in schools. Educational Psychology, 23(5), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341032000123787 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341032000123787

Rigby, K., & Barnes, A. (2002). Victimized Student's Dilemma To Tell or Not To Tell. Youth Studies Australia, 21(3), 33–36.

Rigby, K., & Johnson, K. (2016). The Prevalence and Effectiveness of Anti-Bullying Strategies Employed in Australian Schools. Adelaide. Retrieved from www.kenrigby.net/School-Action

Smith PK, del Barrio C, & Tokunaga R. (2012) Definitions of bullying and cyberbullying: How useful are the terms? In Principles of Cyberbullying Research: Definition, Measures, and Methods, ed. S Bauman, D Cross, J Walker, pp. 29–40. Philadelphia, PA: Routledge

Thomas, H. J., Connor, J. P., & Scott, J. G. (2014). Integrating Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying: Challenges of Definition and Measurement in Adolescents – a Review. Educational Psychology Review, 27(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9261-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9261-7

Yoon, J. S. (2004). Predicting teacher interventions in bullying situations. Education and Treatment of Children, 27(1), 37–45. https://bit.ly/2GqblZj

Downloads

Published

02-01-2021

How to Cite

Lojo Novo, A., Shelton, B., & Azevedo, K. B. (2021). Education Professionals’ Knowledge And Needs Regarding Bullying. EDU REVIEW. International Education and Learning Review Revista Internacional De Educación Y Aprendizaje, 8(4), pp. 265–273. https://doi.org/10.37467/gka-revedu.v8.2665

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 4 (2020)

Section

Research articles

License

Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright.

  2. Authors transfer to the journal the right of first publication. The journal also owns the publishing rights.

  3. All published contents are governed by an Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
    Access the informative version and legal text of the license. By virtue of this, third parties are allowed to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal. If you transform the material, you may not distribute the modified work.

  4. Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.

  5. Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional and personal websites), following the publication of, and referencing the journal, as this could lead to constructive exchanges and a more extensive and quick circulation of published works (see The Effect of Open Access).