Integración de Montessori en STEAM en Educación Infantil: Una revisión sistemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62701/revedu.v13.5470Palabras clave:
STEAM, Montessori, Educación infantil, Preescolar, Docente de preescolar, Revisión Sistemática, PRISMAResumen
Esta revisión sistemática de la literatura analiza la implementación de la educación STEAM mediante el Método Montessori en niños de 3 a 6 años. Siguiendo los protocolos PRISMA, se analizaron 11 estudios (2006–2023) centrados en aspectos pedagógicos, currículo, actividades, formación docente y desarrollo infantil. Los resultados muestran una fuerte conexión entre la pedagogía Montessori y STEAM, con impactos positivos en el aprendizaje infantil y el desarrollo profesional docente. Futuros estudios deberían explorar cómo la formación Montessori puede mejorar las prácticas educativas, especialmente en proyectos de investigación-acción y en la integración de STEAM en la educación infantil.
Descargas
Estadísticas globales ℹ️
|
2
Visualizaciones
|
1
Descargas
|
|
3
Total
|
|
Citas
Altamirano, M. J. U., Jaña, C. E. M., & González, F. O. (2020). Uso educativo de TIC en un salón Montessori: diálogo entre la tecnología digital y los ritos de interacción social en el aula. Revista De Estudios Y Experiencias En Educación, 19(41), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.21703/rexe.20201941umana2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21703/rexe.20201941umana2
Aslan Tutak, F., Akaygün, S., & Tezsezen, S. (2017). İşbirlikli FeTeMM (Fen, Teknoloji, Mühendislik, Matematik) Eğitimi Uygulaması: Kimya ve Matematik Öğretmen Adaylarının FeTeMM Farkındalıklarının İncelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(4), 794-816. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2017027115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2017027115
Aydemir, S., Uğraş, M., Çambay, Ö., & Kiliç, A. (2017). Prospective Pre-School Teachers’ Views on the Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry. Üniversitepark BüLten, 6(2), 74-87 http://dx.doi.org/10.22521/unibulletin.2017.62.6
Bermúdez, V. N., Salazar, J., Garcia, L., Ochoa, K. D., Pesch, A., Roldan, W., Soto-Lara, S., García, W. G., Rodríguez, R., Hirsh‐Pasek, K., Ahn, J., & Bustamante, A. S. (2023). Designing culturally situated playful environments for early STEM learning with a Latine community. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 65, 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.06.003
Bers, M. U. (2008). Blocks to Robots: Learning with Technology in the Early Childhood Classroom. Teachers College Press.
Bian, L., Leslie, S., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389-391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6524
Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Koellner, K., & Swackhamer, L. E. (2015). Mathematics professional development: Improving teaching using the problem-solving cycle and leadership preparation models. Teachers College Press.
Buldu, M., & Erden, F. T. (2017). An investigation of Turkish Early Childhood Teachers’ Self-Reported Beliefs and Practices Regarding Assessment. Journal of Education and Future, 11, 29-49. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jef/issue/28788/308229
Bush, S. B., & Cook, K. (2019). Structuring STEAM Inquiries: Lessons Learned from Practice. Springer, 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_2
Çakır, Z., & Yalçin, D. D. S. A. (2020). Pre-School teacher candidates’ views on STEM applications based on Montessori approach. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 11(3), 344-367. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.636526 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.636526
Çakır, Z., & Yalçın, S. A. (2021a). The investigation of the effect of Montessori approach-based STEM activities on the problem-solving skills of pre-service preschool teachers. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 14(2), 93-119. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.824773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.824773
Çakır, Z., & Yalçın, S. A. (2021b). Montessori Yaklaşımı Temelli STEM Etkinliklerinin Öğretmen Adaylarının Fene ve Fen Öğretimine Yönelik Tutumlarına Etkisi. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum AraşTırmaları Dergisi, 17(35), 1895-1924. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.831879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.831879
Çakır, Z., & Yalçın, S. A. (2022). The effect of Montessori approach-based STEM education on pre-service pre-school teachers’ self-directed learning. e-International Journal of Educational Research, 13(2), 142-162. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1038793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1038793
Callaghan, S., Darbyshire, T., & Farajnia, S. (2020). Ada Lovelace Day and celebrating women in STEM. Patterns, 1(7), 100125. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.patter.2020.100125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100125
Castiglione, C. (2016). Technology and the Prepared Environment for the Third-Plane Child Technology and the Prepared Environment. The NAMTA Journal, 41(2), 131-150.
Clarke‐Midura, J., Lee, V. R., Shumway, J. F., Silvis, D., Kozlowski, J. S., & Peterson, R. (2023). Designing formative assessments of early childhood computational thinking. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 65, 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.05.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.05.013
Clements, D. (1998). Young Children and Technology (Paper presented at the Forum on Early Childhood Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED416991.pdf
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 138-167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
Cubelic, C. C., & Larwin, K. H. (2014). The Use of iPad Technology in the Kindergarten Classroom: A Quasi-Experimental Investigation of the Impact on Early Literacy Skills. Education, Computer Science, 2(4), 47-59.
Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L. E., O’Hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts (CHI EA '11: CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems), Association for Computing Machinery, 2425-2428. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979575 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979575
Dinda, R. R. A. A., & Nugraha, M. G. (2023). The Development of philosophy in early childhood pedagogy: Western, Eastern, and national perspectives, International Conference on Indigenous Psychology and Culture, 1(1), 77-88. https://seminar.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/icipc/article/view/716
Durakoğlu, A. (2011). Maria Montessori’ye göre okul öncesi Çocukluk döneminin özellikleri. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(16), 133-145. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/zgefd/issue/47949/606680
Elkin, M., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2014). Implementing a robotics curriculum in an early childhood montessori classroom. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 13, 153-169. https://doi.org/10.28945/2094 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/2094
Elkind, D. (1983). Montessori Education: Abiding Contributions and Contemporary Challenges. Young Children, 38(2), 3–10. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42721000
Eratay, E. (2011). Efficiency of Montessori method. Eğitim Ve Öğretim, 1(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.14527/C1S1M2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14527/C1S1M2
Fehr, K. (2020). STEM Integration in the Montessori Early Childhood Classroom. UWRF Graduate Research Papers. https://minds.wisconsin.edu/handle/1793/81521
Fernández-Oliveras, A. F., Correa, V. M., & Oliveras, M. (2016). Estudio de una propuesta lúdica para la educación científica y matemática globalizada en infantil. Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza Y Divulgación De Las Ciencias, 13(2), 373-383. http://hdl.handle.net/10498/18294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2016.v13.i2.10
Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study. Computers & Education, 63, 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016
García‐Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Desarrollo de estados de la cuestión robustos: Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura. Education in the Knowledge Society, 23, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600
García-Valcárcel-Muñoz-Repiso, A., & Caballero-González, Y. (2019). Robotics to develop computational thinking in early Childhood Education. Comunicar, 27(59), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.3916/c59-2019-06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C59-2019-06
Gibert, K., & Valls, A. (2022). Building a territorial working group to reduce gender gap in the field of artificial intelligence. Applied Sciences, 12(6), 3129. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12063129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12063129
Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: a primer. CRS Report for Congress. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED593605
Grabe, S. (2020). Research methods in the study of intersectionality in Psychology: examples informed by a decade of collaborative work with Majority World women’s grassroots activism. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.494309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.494309
Günşen, G. (2017). Okul öncesi dönemde STEM yaklaşımı. Asos journal, 42(42), 337-348. https://doi.org/10.16992/asos.12042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.12042
Higgins, J.P.T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M.J., & Welch, V.A. (2024). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2nd Edition). Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons. www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
Ireland, D. T., Freeman, K. E., Winston-Proctor, C. E., DeLaine, K., Lowe, S. M., & Woodson, K. M. (2018). (Un)Hidden Figures: A synthesis of research examining the intersectional experiences of Black women and girls in STEM education. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 226–254. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x18759072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18759072
Jones, M. R. (2016). Implementing Technology in the Primary Montessori Classroom. St. Catherine University repository website. https://sophia.stkate.edu/maed/149
Jones, S. (2017). Technology in the Montessori Classroom: Teachers’ beliefs and technology use. Journal of Montessori Research, 3(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v3i1.6458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v3i1.6458
Juárez, A. G., Samuel-Lajeunesse, J. F. I., & Vitores, A. (2012). Gender and ICT: around the gender digital divide. Athenea Digital, 12(3), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenead/v12n3.1137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenead/v12n3.1137
Karplus, R. (1976). Science Teaching and the Development of Reasoning. Occasional Paper Series. ERIC. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED123128.pdf
Kayılı, G., & Arı, R. (2011). Examination of the effects of the Montessori method on preschool children’s readiness to primary education. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 11(4), 2104–2109. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ962690.pdf
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. NICTA Technical Report. http://artemisa.unicauca.edu.co/~ecaldon/docs/spi/kitchenham_2004.pdf
Liao, C. (2019). Creating a STEAM Map: A content analysis of visual art practices in STEAM education. Springer, 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_3
Lillard, A. S. (2019). Shunned and admired: Montessori, Self-Determination, and a case for radical school reform. Educational Psychology Review, 31(4), 939-965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09483-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09483-3
Lillard, A. S., & McHugh, V. (2019). Authentic Montessori: The Dottoressa’s View at the End of Her Life Part I: The Environment. Journal of Montessori Research, 5(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v5i1.7716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v5i1.7716
López, S. R., & Sorribas, C. G. (2020). Transformación metodológica de la Escola Montessori de Rubí desde una perspectiva STEAM y de género. Participación Educativa, 7(10), 123–136. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7459316
Lorenzo-Vila, A. (2021). Aprendizaje del ELE mediante contenidos digitales en una escuela Montessori de Educación Infantil. Master Thesis. Reunir. https://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/12312
Love, A., & Sikorski, P. (2000). Integrating Technology in a Montessori Classroom. ERIC. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED441600.pdf
Luttenberger, S., Paechter, M., & Ertl, B. (2019). Self-Concept and support experienced in school as key variables for the motivation of women enrolled in STEM subjects with a low and moderate proportion of females. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01242
MacDonald, G. (2016). Technology in the Montessori Classroom: Benefits, Hazards and Preparation for Life. The NAMTA Journal, 41(2), 99-107.
Madden, M. E., Baxter, M., Beauchamp, H. M., Bouchard, K., Habermas, D., Huff, M. J., Ladd, B. C., Pearon, J., & Plague, G. R. (2013). Rethinking STEM Education: An Interdisciplinary STEAM curriculum. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 541-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.316
Marmon, M. (2019). The Emergence of the Creativity in STEM: fostering an alternative approach for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics instruction through the use of the arts. Springer, 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_6
Migliorino, N. J., & Jeffrey, M. (2004). Educator attitudes toward electronic grading software. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 193-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782412
Mintz, A. I. (2016). Dewey’s ancestry, Dewey’s legacy, and the aims of education in democracy and education. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.437
Montessori, M. (1949). The absorbent mind. The theosophical publishing house.
Montessori, M. (1948). The discovery of the child. Kalakshetra publications.
Montessori, M. M. (1956). The human tendencies and Montessori education. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Association Montessori Internationale.
Montessori, M. M. (1987). Education for Human Development: Understanding Montessori. Buckminster Fuller.
Namukasa, I. K., & Aryee, K. L. (2021). Pedagogical knowledge for teaching mathematics in montessori schools. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11005
NAEA. (2022, June 1st). Position Statement on STEAM Education. National Art Education Association. https://www.arteducators.org/advocacy-policy/articles/552-naea-position-statement-on-steam-education
Oğuz, B. U. V., & Akyol, D. D. a. K. (2006). Çocuk eğitiminde montessori yaklaşımı. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15(1), 243-256. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cusosbil/iss
Orosco, L. M. N., & Serquén, R. L. L. (2018). Materiales sensoriales Montessori en el desarrollo de la noción de seriación en infantes de cinco años. Eduser, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.18050/RevEduser.v5n1a4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18050/RevEduser.v5n1a4
Owen, S., & Davies, S. (2020). Maintaining an empowered school community: Introducing digital technologies by building digital literacies at Beehive Montessori School. London Review of Education, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.14324/lre.18.3.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.18.3.03
Özgün, B. B. (2019). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Stem (+A+E) Eğitimi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(42), 429-438. https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.657383 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.657383
Page M. J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P. M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T. C., Mulrow C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E., Mayo‐Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . . Moher, D. et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Palmér, H. (2017). Programming in Preschool--With a focus on learning mathematics. Early Childhood Education, 8(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.4225/03/5a6d25a6bfb03
Prozesky, K., & Cıfuentes, L. (2014). The Montessori approach to integrating technology. Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji, 10, 29-38. https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/pwe/article/view/920
Ramakrisnan, P., Yahya, Y. B., Hasrol, M. N. H., & Aziz, A. A. (2012). Blended Learning: A suitable framework for E-Learning in Higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 513-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.356
Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DIGCOMPEDU. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Relkin, E., & Bers, M. U. (2019). Designing an assessment of computational thinking abilities for young children. Routledge eBooks, 83–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429453755-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429453755-5
Sackett, G. (2016). The Scientist in the Classroom: The Montessori Teacher as Scientist. The NAMTA Journal, 41(2), 5-20.
Sak, İ. T. Ş. (2015). Okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının Montessori ve Reggio Emilia yaklaşımları ile ilgili görüşleri. Journal of Inonu University Faculty of Education, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.17679/iuefd.58218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17679/iuefd.58218
Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006
Silvis, D., Clarke‐Midura, J., Shumway, J. F., Lee, V. R., & Lewis, S. (2022). Children caring for robots: Expanding computational thinking frameworks to include a technological ethic of care. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 33, 100491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100491
Şimşek, M., & Tuğluk, M. N. (2021). Making learning visible in the 21st Century: Examining the use of digital assessment tools in Montessori education. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 11(2), 72-86. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2021.08
Singh, D., & Singh, B. (2020). Investigating the impact of data normalization on classification performance. Applied Soft Computing, 97. https://rb.gy/olstgn DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105524
Snow, C. P. (1961). The two cultures and the scientific revolution (7th ed.). The rede lectures 1959. The Syndics of the Cambridge University Press. https://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/students/envs_5110/snow_1959.pdf
Standing, E. M., (1957). Maria Montessori: Her Life and Work. Academy Library Guild.
Stark, M. B. (1976). A multi-sensory curriculum for young children (Thesis). University of the Pacific. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/1895
Stroud, A., & Baines, L. (2019). Inquiry, investigative processes, art, and writing in STEAM. Springer, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_1
Sullivan, A., Strawhacker, A., & Bers, M. U. (2017). Dancing, Drawing, and Dramatic Robots: Integrating robotics and the arts to teach foundational STEAM concepts to young children. Springer, 231-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57786-9_10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57786-9_10
Sullivan, A., & Strawhacker, A. (2021). Screen-Free STEAM: Low-Cost and hands-on approaches to eaching coding and engineering to young children. Springer, 87-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65624-9_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65624-9_5
Timur, B., & Taşar, M. F. (2011). The Adaptation of the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Confidence Survey into Turkish. DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals, 10(2), 839-856. https://doaj.org/article/7db2d26d9fd64901bf08d893006b95bf
Timur, B., & Taşar, M. F. (2021). Teknoloji Destekli Öğretimlerin Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının TPAB Özgüvenleri ve Fen Öğretiminde Bilgisayar Kullanımına Yönelik Öz-Yeterlik İnançlarına Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(36), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2020.367.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2020.367.1
Toussaint, R. (2022). #BlackGirlMathMagic: A mixed methods study examining African American girls in standardized MathematicsTesting. LSU Scolarly Repository https://doi.org/10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.5610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.5610
Uğraş, M. (2017). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin STEM uygulamalarına yönelik görüşlerini. JONPES, 1(1),39-54.
Ünlü, Z. K., & Dere, Z. (2018). Okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının hazırladıkları FETEMM etkinliklerinin değerlendirilmesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2), 1502-1512. http://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.2018.19.02.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.2018.19.02.012
van Eck N. J., & Waltman L. (2023). VOSviewer Manual. University of Leiden. https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.19.pdf
Vatavu, R., Cramariuc, G., & Schipor, D. M. (2015). Touch interaction for children aged 3 to 6 years: Experimental findings and relationship to motor skills. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 54-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.10.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.10.007
Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
Yakman, G. (2006). STEM Pedagogical Commons for Contextual Learning: How Fewer Teaching Divisions Can Provide More Relevant Learning Connections. Virginia Tech. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10682.44489
Yaman, S., & Yalçın, N. (2005). Fen bilgisi öğretiminde probleme dayalı öğrenme yaklaşımının yaratıcı düşünme becerisine etkisi. Elementary Education Online, 4(1), 42-52. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ilkonline/issue/8609/107241
Zhu, L., & Goyal, Y. (2019). Art and science: Intersections of art and science through time and paths forward. EMBO reports, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201847061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201847061
Zuckerman, O., Arida, S., & Resnick, M. (2005). Extending tangible interfaces for education. CHI ’05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 859-868 https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055093
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación y el derecho de edición
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
- Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor.
- Los autores/as ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación. La revista también posee los derechos de edición.
- Todos los contenidos publicados se regulan mediante una Licencia Atribución/Reconocimiento-SinDerivados 4.0 Internacional. Acceda a la versión informativa y texto legal de la licencia. En virtud de ello, se permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista. Si transforma el material, no podrá distribuir el trabajo modificado.
- Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo en páginas institucionales o personales), una vez publicado en la revista y citando a la misma ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos y a una mayor y más rápida difusión del trabajo publicado (vea The Effect of Open Access).
