Recommendation of Innovative Strategies to Increase Competitiveness and Quality in Most Relevant Sectors of the NAFTA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37467/gka-revsocial.v4.801Keywords:
Competitiveness, Quality, Recommendations, NAFTAAbstract
The Treaty of free trade agreement (NAFTA). After 20 years of its entry into force, to start its term was believed that the agreement would be a stage of economic growth, increased employment and increase the purchasing power of the wage for Mexico but the situation was not so. Mexico has experienced a low rate of growth, in 2009 was the country in the Western hemisphere with greater recoil in GDP and in the years 2013-2014 the country fell two positions in the Global competitiveness index passing place 53 to 55 because of a low score of 4.36 to 4.34. What was it that happened? Why it failed these expectations? What were the factors affecting to have these results? Where the lack of competitiveness and quality were determining factors for increasing their exports? After analyzing the NAFTA strategies are recommended to improve competitiveness significantly, making joint actions in the subjects of business, sustainability, intellectual capacity and production processes, promoting competitiveness, connectivity, productivity and innovation in companies that are involved in NAFTA to increase the benefits achieved.
References
Antecedentes Generales del TLCAN. (2014). Recuperado de http://Catarina.udlap.mx/u_dl_a/tales/documentos/lfis/...s.../capitulo1.pdf
Amighini, A. (2003). Upgrading in the global economy: Evidence from Selected Sectors in Latin America . Italia: Agora 2000.
Bair, J. y Gereffi, G. (2001). Local clusters in global chains: the causes and consequences of export dynamism in Torreon’s Blue Jeans Industry. World development , 29 (11) pp 1845-1903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00075-4
Bell, M. y Pavitt, K. (1993). Technological accumulation and industrial growth: contrast between developed and developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2 (2), pp. 157-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/2.2.157
Bueno, E. (2002). Enfoques principales y tendencias en dirección del conocimiento (knowledge management ). En R. Hernández Mogollón (coord.), Gestión del conocimiento (pp. 21-54). Trujillo, España: La Coria.
CONEVAL (2012). Evolución de Dimensiones de la Pobreza 1990-2012. Recuperado de http//www.coneval.gob.mx/Medicion/Paginas/Evolucion-de-las-dimensiones-de-lapobreza-1990-2010.
Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas sobre Comercio y Desarrollo. (2000). Informe sobre las inversiones en el mundo 2000. Las fusiones y adquisiciones transfronterizas y el desarrollo. Panorama general. Nueva York, EE.UU/Ginebra, Suiza: ONU.
Cuevas, H. (2012). Sectores beneficiados con el Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte después de 17 años de su entrada en vigor . Ciudad de México, México: Perfiles.
Forbes, México (2013/12/16): Los 35 mexicanos más ricos. Recuperado de http://www.forbes.com.mx/sites/los-35-mexicanos-mas-ricos/.
INEGI. (2008). Banco de Indicadores Económicos (BIE): Cuentas Nacionales (Producto Interno Bruto Trimestral, Base 2008). Recuperado de http:// www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/bie
Ivancevich, J. M., Lorenzi, P., Skinner, S. J. y Crosby, P. B. (1997). Gestión. Calidad y Competitividad. España: McGraw Hill Interamericana.
La Jornada. (2013/12/31). El Espejismo del TLCAN. La Jornada Edición Electrónica. Recuperado de http://www.jornada.unam.mx/ultimas/2013/12/31/el-espejismo-del-tlcan-1468.html.
Larrosa, J.M. (2000). Aprendizaje organizacional y administración del conocimiento en los nuevos escenarios. Recuperado de http:// Larrosa.tripod.com/files/humanresources.pdf.
Mendes de Paula, G., E. Pereira Silva y T. M. Couto da Silva (2000). Panorama do processo de fusões y aquisições na América Latina, 1990-99 . Uberlandia, Brasil: Universidade Federal de Uberlândia-Instituto de Economia.
González, J., Gómez, C. y Celaya, R (2014). Competitividad, Regionalismo e Integración de México con Asia Pacífico. Sonora, México: Ed. ITSON.
Octuga, (2012). Observatorio de ciencia y tecnología. Revista de la Universidad de Galicia. Recuperado de http://www.octuga/html/documentos.
Padua, M. (1999). México en el umbral del siglo XXI, los efectos de la Globalización. México: Fontamara.
Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectorial patterns of technical change: towards taxonomy and a theory. Research policy, 13 (6), pp. 343-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
Perez, P. (2000). Learning, adjustment and economic development: transforming firms. The State and associations in Chile. World development , 28 (1). pp. 41-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00113-8
Portal de negocios (2014). Artículos informativos. Recuperado de http://www.articulosinformativos.com.mx.
Rabellotti, R. y Amighini, A. (2001). The effect of globalization on industrial districts in Italy: The case of Brenta. ERSA conference papers . Viena, Austria: European Regional Science Association.
Ruiz Durán, C. (2003). Cadenas de valor y clúster del software en México . México: Mimeógrafo de Ágora 2000-para el BID.
Von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation . New York, EE.UU: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:
- Authors will keep the moral right of the work and they will transfer the commercial rights.
- After 1 year from publication, the work shall thereafter be open access online on our website, but will retain copyright.
- In the event that the authors wish to assign an Creative Commons (CC) license, they may request it by writing to publishing@eagora.org
